INNOVATION V.S,AMELIORATION IN ARCHITECIURE

Most of the random of historic architec   Mtural examples followed two lines
of Classic & Gothic architectures. They were both enforced by their
creators as their cultural imprints on their followers whether in the same
country or others. Each diplomatic power carried its architecture as a sign
of its identity and enforced it on their protectorates. The pharos went to
Nubia with pharaonic style
The Greeks coming to Egypt, a country with long lasting style, were only
able to use a mixture of their approach and the existing one that showed up
during the Ptolemy rule.
The Roman Empire and its resulting architecture were divided religlously
into eastern & western churches Each was influ – enced politically by its
paradigm. Eastern and western churches showed up when the gothic and
Byzantine architectures came to the foreground with thelr international
influences lasting one thousand years. They both went under the
ecclesiastical power to spread the Gothic in western church and the
Byzantine in the Eastern One. The developments in bolh were expected to
move to Romanticism.
The freedom from the religlous power showed architecturally with the
return back of western classical style moving for decades for amelioration
rather than innovation. Six centuries passes with the Renaissance influence
politically replacing ieligious domain. lt moved from late Renaissance to the
Baroque extravaganza.