The Future of the Contemporary City 4من اصل7

we can see that the degree of it intelligence or stupidity is not his first focus of
attention. But more importantly is the lifestyle and the quality of public areas in it
and the movement in parts of the city and through various spaces. Also the ability of
the city to receive, absorb and realize opportunities for interaction and coexistence.
The resident or visitor focuses on the vital of the city and its colors. These dimensions
are difficult to appear on mobile phones or smart screen linked to a network of
geographic information, but it is the state that creates existence between man and
the city.
If the saying that says is that: “Technology is the solution, it seems that we need to
think about what was the question that asked in the first
place in order to be the best answer is that technology is the solution. If your answer
is technology means understanding that the city is constructed from buildings,
facilities, services and infrastructure, so this proposal be accepted. But the city is not
only the buildings and services, but first and foremost it is the human, and let us
always remember Shakespeare’s famous saying, “What is the city but human beings.”
Hence the hypothesis begins: Is important that to describe the city with intelligence
or describe its residents and visitors with intelligence?
The alternative idea: the smart-stupid and the stupidity-smart city
In the face of the fragmentation, crumble, and individualism of the Smart City in its
current conception, we present the concept of the new generation of the Smart City
which should exceed the previous generations which depended only on the
technological aspects. This new generation should produce cities its biggest